Imprimer cet article
La Croissance éxagérée de la Chine
Il semble que de plus en plus d’analystes, économistes et journalistes s’intéressent de près aux chiffres de la croissance chinoise, et notamment sur ses aspects exagérés. On avait pu déjà parler sur graphseo d’un paradoxe face à la croissance de la chine sur fond de crise économique alors que sa demande intérieure faible et la baisse drastique de ses exportations auraient du la faire rentrer dans une croissance nettement moindre voir même une récession. Tout le paradoxe résidant dans une consommation électrique en baisse dans un pays avec une croissance de 10%… Voilà maintenant qu’on avance que l’État chinois oblige des entreprises à acheter des automobiles ou encore les usines à poursuivre leur production même sans demande en poursuivant le stockage. La prochaine bulle viendra t-elle alors de l’Asie ?
“Beijing, in the 1990s, ordered factories to churn out goods in periods of low demand, and there are indications that officials are resorting to this tactic now. While optimistic analysts point to astounding car sales–up 70.5% in July, 94.7% in August and 83.6% in September–there are reports that central government officials have ordered state enterprises to buy fleets of vehicles and that these businesses are storing them in parking lots across the country. These stories are as yet unconfirmed, but they are consistent with statistics showing that gasoline sales have been flat this year–up only 6.4% in August, for instance, and sliding since then from all indications. So here’s another question: At a time when economic activity is supposedly rising at a quick pace, how can large increases in passenger vehicle sales not be accompanied by corresponding surges in fuel usage? (emhasis added)
The answer is that Beijing’s statisticians have gone back to their old tactic of making up figures to support the Politburo’s predictions. The Chinese economy is probably growing due to state-led investment, but it cannot be doing so at the rates claimed. Wen Jiabao’s stimulus plan is, above all, grossly inefficient. For all the money he is pouring into the economy, the country is getting a small return in economic output. That’s why Premier Wen, despite the high growth numbers he’s been reporting, consistently refuses to end his stimulus program. If his numbers were real, he would be worried about overheating. But he’s apparently not.”
